Disposed

Mehraj Malik v. Ut of J and K Th. Principal Secretary to Government Home Department, Jammu and Others

J&K HC7 Sept 2026WP(C)/2805/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir dismissed a writ petition but disposed of the matter at the threshold by directing respondents to consider the petitioner's representations on security cover restoration and submit the case to the Security Review Coordination Committee for decision within six weeks.

What did the court decide?

Respondents directed to consider petitioner's representations on security cover and place case before Security Review Coordination Committee to decide appropriate security level within six weeks.

Mehraj Malik Vs Ut of J and K Th. Principal Secretary to… — Service and Employment | J&K HC (2026)

¶1

Serial No. 29

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU

¶3

Case: WP(C) No. 2805/2026

¶4

Mehraj Malik …..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)

¶5

Through: Ms. Appu Singh Salathia, Advocate

U.T. of J&K & Ors.

.…. Respondent(s)

Through: Ms. Monika Kohli, Sr. AAG

¶10

Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY DHAR, JUDGE

¶11

ORDER

¶12

07.09.2026

¶13

Petitioner, through the medium of present petition has sought a direction upon the respondents to restore his security cover, including the escort vehicle.

¶14

It is contention of the petitioner that he is a member of the Legislative Assembly of the Union Territory of Jammu and Kashmir and in that connection, he has to travel across various parts of the Union Territory of J&K for political and public engagements. It has been further contended that since 28.04.2026, security cover provided to the petitioner has been reduced without any proper consideration and his escort vehicle has also been withdrawn.

¶15

According to the petitioner, he has made a number of representations to the respondents to restore his security cover but without any success. Hence, the present petition.

¶16

Issue notice to the respondents. Ms. Monika Kohli, learned Sr. AAG accepts notice on behalf of the respondents.

¶17

Having regard to the nature of the grievance that has been projected by the petitioner in the present petition, the same can be disposed of at the threshold itself by issuing appropriate directions to the respondents.

¶18

Accordingly, the respondents are directed to consider the representations already made by the petitioner in accordance with law and take a decision thereon. The respondents shall place the case of the petitioner before the

¶19

Security Review Coordination Committee (SRCC) to assess the threat perception and thereafter make arrangements for appropriate level of security in his favour, expeditiously, within a period of six weeks from the date a copy of this order is served upon the respondents.

¶20

The petition, is accordingly, Disposed of.

¶21

(SANJAY DHAR) JUDGE

¶22

Jammu 07.09.2026 Suraj K. Singh

Mehraj Malik v. Ut of J and K Th. Principal Secretary to Government Home Department, Jammu and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mehraj Malik v. Ut of J and K Th. Principal Secretary to Government Home Department, Jammu and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases