Disposed

Tanveer Ahmad Khan v. Union Territory of J and K and Others (School Education)

J&K HC18 Sept 2026WP(C)/2322/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioner sought to have the writ petition treated as a representation after the court questioned its maintainability. With consent of both parties, the court disposed of the writ petition directing respondents to consider it as a representation within four weeks and communicate the decision by registered post.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition treated as representation; respondents directed to consider within four weeks and communicate decision by registered post.

Tanveer Ahmad Khan Vs Union Territory of J and K and… — Writ and Judicial Review | J&K HC (2026)

¶1

Serial No.92 SUPP CAUSE LIST

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR

¶3

WP(C) 2322/2026 CM(6322/2026)

¶4

TANVEER AHMAD KHAN …Petitioner/Appellant(s)

¶5

Through: Mr. Tawheed Ahmad, Advocate

¶6

Vs.

¶7

UT OF J&K AND ORS.

¶8

...Respondent(s)

¶9

Through: Ms. Sana Imam, Advocate for R-3 to R-5

¶10

CORAM:

¶11

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL, JUDGE

¶12

ORDER

¶13

18.09.2026

¶14

After arguing for a while, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner when confronted with the maintainability of the instant writ petition, submits that the petitioner would feel satisfied in case the instant writ petition is disposed of at this stage with a direction to the respondents to treat the same as a representation and accord consideration to the same within a reasonable period.

¶15

On asking of the Court, Mr. Hakim Aman Ali, learned Deputy Advocate General, caused appearance and accepted notice on behalf of the respondents and he is not averse to the disposal of the instant petition by treating the same as representation. However, he submits that the representation of the petitioner would be considered strictly in conformity with the law and the rules governing the field.

¶16

Heard learned counsel for the parties at length and perused the record.

¶17

With the consent of the learned counsel for the parties, the present writ petition is taken up for final disposal at the very threshold as an innocuous prayer has been made by the learned counsel for the petitioner and the same is accordingly disposed of with a direction to the respondents to treat this writ petition as representation on behalf of the petitioner and accord consideration to the same within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order along with copy of writ petition and the annexures appended thereto, strictly in conformity with the rules and as per law. The order of consideration which is likely to be passed by the respondents be forwarded to the petitioners by registered post.

¶18

Writ petition disposed of along with connected application(s) in the manner indicated above.

¶19

(Wasim Sadiq Nargal)
Judge
SRINAGAR:
18.09.2026
“ARIF”

Tanveer Ahmad Khan v. Union Territory of J and K and Others (School Education)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Tanveer Ahmad Khan v. Union Territory of J and K and Others (School Education)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases