Disposed

Haji Assad Ullah Ganie v. Union Territory of J and K and Others (Revenue)

J&K HC15 Sept 2026WP(C)/2290/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioner sought relief through a writ petition. With consent of both parties, the court disposed of the petition at the threshold, directing the respondents to treat the writ petition as a representation and decide it within four weeks in accordance with law and rules.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition treated as representation; respondents directed to consider and decide within four weeks and communicate decision by registered post.

Haji Assad Ullah Ganie Vs Union Territory of J and K… — Writ and Judicial Review | J&K HC (2026)

¶1

Serial No.125 SUPP. CAUSE LIST

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR

¶3

WP(C) 2290/2026 CM(6236/2026)

¶4

HAJI ASSAD ULLAH GANIE …Petitioner/Appellant(s)

¶5

Through: Mr. Zahoor Ahmad Shah, Advocate

¶6

Vs.

¶7

UT OF J&K AND ORS.

¶8

...Respondent(s)

¶9

Through: Mr. Hakim Aman Ali, Dy. AG

¶10

CORAM:

¶11

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL, JUDGE

¶12

ORDER

¶13

15.09.2026

¶14

After arguing for a while, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, submits that the petitioner would feel satisfied in case the instant writ petition is disposed of at this stage with a direction to the respondents to treat the same as a representation and accord consideration to the same within a reasonable period.

¶15

On asking of the Court, Mr. Hakim Aman Ali, learned Deputy Advocate General, caused appearance and accepted notice on behalf of the respondents and he is not averse to the disposal of the instant petition by treating the same as representation. However, he submits that the representation of the petitioner would be considered strictly in conformity with the law and the rules governing the field.

¶16

Heard learned counsel for the parties at length and perused the record.

¶17

With the consent of the learned counsel for the parties, the present writ petition is taken up for final disposal at the very threshold as an

¶18

innocuous prayer has been made by the learned counsel for the petitioner and the same is accordingly disposed of with a direction to the respondents to treat this writ petition as representation on behalf of the petitioner and accord consideration to the same within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order along with copy of writ petition and the annexures appended thereto, strictly in conformity with the rules and as per law. The order of consideration which is likely to be passed by the respondents be forwarded to the petitioners by registered post.

¶19

Writ petition disposed of along with connected application(s) in the

¶20

manner indicated above.

¶21

(Wasim Sadiq Nargal) Judge

¶22

SRINAGAR:
15.09.2026
“ARIF”

Haji Assad Ullah Ganie v. Union Territory of J and K and Others (Revenue)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Haji Assad Ullah Ganie v. Union Territory of J and K and Others (Revenue)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases