The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh treated the instant writ petition as a representation to be considered by the Chief Engineer, Jal Shakti Department, Kashmir, after affording an opportunity of hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Serial No.137 Supplementary Cause List
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR
WP(C) 2237/2026 CM(6085/2026)
TANVEER AHMAD MIR AND OTHERS
…Appellant(s)\Petitioner(s)
Through: -
Mr. Wani Manzoor, Advocate.
V/s
UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K TH.CHIEF ENGINEER(PHE) AND OTHERS
… Respondent(s)
Through: - Mr. Jehangir Dar, GA.
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR JUSTICE SANJAY PARIHAR, JUDGE
(ORDER) 11.09.2026
opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and pass a speaking order at the
earliest.
5. The writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of.
(SANJAY PARIHAR) JUDGE
SRINAGAR
11.09.2026 Shaista-PS
TANVEER AHMAD MIR AND OTHERS
UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K TH.CHIEF ENGINEER(PHE) AND OTHERS
SANJAY PARIHAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
