This order dismisses a writ petition for non-prosecution as the petitioner failed to appear on consecutive dates and did not represent interest in prosecuting the matter.
Writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution and connected applications are dismissed. Interim directions, if any, are vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Serial No. 70
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
WP(C) No. 2231/2019 CM No. 4549/2019
Anju Jain …..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through: None.
Vs
Union of India & Ors.
.…. Respondent(s)
Through: Mr. Vikas Sharma, Advocate.
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL, JUDGE ORDER (03.09.2026)
last two consecutive dates of hearing. Today also, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. It appears that the petitioner is
no longer interested in prosecuting the present petition.
with connected application(s).
(WASIM SADIQ NARGAL)
JUDGE
Jammu
03.09.2026
Renu
Anju Jain
Union of India
WASIM SADIQ NARGAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
