Petitioners failed to appear for two consecutive hearings including the current one. The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir dismissed the writ petition for non-prosecution and vacated any interim direction.
Writ petition dismissed for non-prosecution; interim direction vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
S. No. 114 Regular List
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR
WP(C) No. 2227/2023
Bilal Ahmad Dar and Ors. …Petitioner(s)
Through: None
Vs.
UT of Jammu and Kashmir and Ors.
...Respondent(s)
Through:
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNESH OSWAL, JUDGE. ORDER
07.09.2026
01. There has been no representation on behalf of the petitioners for the last two consecutive dates of hearings. Same is the position today as well. It seems that petitioners are no more interested in pursuing the instant matter.
02. Dismissed for non non-prosecution.
03. Interim direction, if any, shall stand vacated.
(RAJNESH OSWAL) JUDGE
SRINAGAR:
07.09.2026
Bilal Ahmad Dar and Ors.
UT of Jammu and Kashmir and Ors.
Rajneesh Oswal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
