The High Court of J&K dismissed the writ petition as not pressed after petitioner counsel submitted that their grievance had been redressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
S. No. 140 Suppl. List
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR
WP(C) No. 2217/2026
Amina Altaf Bhat
…Petitioner(s)/Appellant(s)
Through: Mr. Ruaani Ahmad Baba, Adv.
Vs.
UT of JK and Ors.
...Respondent(s)
Through: Ms. Raheela Khan, AC.
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNESH OSWAL, JUDGE. ORDER
11.09.2026
01. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he does not want to press the instant petition as the grievance of the petitioners stands redressed.
02. Dismissed as not pressed.
03. Interim direction, if any, shall stand vacated.
(RAJNESH OSWAL) JUDGE
SRINAGAR:
11.09.2026
Amina Altaf Bhat
UT of JK and Ors.
RAJNESH OSWAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
