Chain Singh v. Ut of Ladkh Th Divisional Commissioner Leh Ladakh and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ petition dismissed for non-prosecution due to petitioner's counsel not appearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Supplementary List-I Serial No. 173
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
WP(C) No. 2154/2022
Chain Singh
…..Petitioner(s)
Through: None.
Vs
UT of Ladakh & Ors.
.….Respondent(s)
Through: Mr. Eishaan Dadhichi, CGSC.
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAHUL BHARTI, JUDGE
ORDER (18.09.2026)
1. If learned counsel for the petitioner is not concerned about his appearance and attendance in the case, then this Court is under no obligation to invest it’s time for consideration in absence of counsel for the petitioner as to whether the case is meant for mediation or not.
2. Dismissed for non-prosecution.
(RAHUL BHARTI) JUDGE
JAMMU 18.09.2026 Shivalee
Chain Singh
UT of Ladakh
Rahul Bharti
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court