Dismissed
Haji Bashir Ahmad Mir v. Union Territory of J and K and Ors. (Revenue Department)
J&K HCWP(C)/2150/2022
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
No. 58 Regular List IN THE HIGH COURT OF…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Serial No. 58 Regular List
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR
WP(C) No. 2150/2022
Haji Bashir Ahmad Mir …Petitioner(s)/Appellant(s).
Through: None
Vs.
UT of JK and Ors.
...Respondent(s).
Through: None
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNESH OSWAL, JUDGE
ORDER
09.09.2026
01. There has been no representation on behalf of the petitioner for the last three consecutive dates of hearings and same is the position today as well. It seems that petitioner is no more interested in pursuing the instant matter.
02. Dismissed for non-prosecution.
03. Interim direction, if any, shall stand vacated.
(RAJNESH OSWAL) JUDGE
SRINAGAR
09.09.2026
“Shamim Dar”
Haji Bashir Ahmad Mir
UT of JK
Rajnesh Oswal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court