The petition was dismissed for non-prosecution after the petitioner failed to appear for several hearing dates and had not appeared since 2023. Any interim directions were vacated.
Petition dismissed for non-prosecution; interim directions vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Serial No. 77 Supplementary List-1
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
WP(C) No. 2111/2023
Mohd. Sharief Matoo
….Petitioner
Through: None
Vs
UT of J&K & Ors.
.…. Respondents
Through: None
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAHUL BHARTI, JUDGE ORDER (08.09.2026)
01. There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner for
the last several dates of hearing and, admittedly, the petitioner has not appeared in the matter since the year 2023 . The continuous absence of the petitioner clearly
for non-prosecution .
02. Interim directions, if any, shall stand vacated.
(RAHUL BHARTI) JUDGE
JAMMU
08.09.2026
SUNIL
Mohd. Sharief Matoo
UT of J&K & Ors.
Rahul Bharti
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
