Petitioner sought withdrawal of the writ petition. The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh dismissed the petition as withdrawn with liberty to file afresh and vacated interim directions.
The writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn; connected CM dismissed with liberty to file afresh; interim direction vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
S. No. 02 Regular Cause List
IN THE HIGH COURT 0F JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR
WP(C) 2080/2026 CM(5623/2026)
MOHDA BHAT
…Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through: Mr. B. S. Bali, Advocate
Vs.
UT of JK and others
...Respondent(s)
Through: None
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PARIHAR, JUDGE
ORDER 07.09.2026
1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he does not want to
pursue this case and seeks withdrawal of the same. His statement is taken on record.
2. In view of the submission so made, the writ petition WP(C) No. 2080/2026 is dismissed as withdrawn along with connected CM with liberty to file afresh in case need arise.
3. Interim direction, if any, shall stand vacated.
(SANJAY PARIHAR)
JUDGE
Srinagar 07.09.2026
“Imtiyaz”
Imtiyaz Ul Gani I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
07.09.2026 14:51
MOHDA BHAT
UT OF JK AND OTHERS
SANJAY PARIHAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
