Writ petition dismissed for non-prosecution after the petitioner failed to appear on multiple hearing dates, including the final date.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Sr. No. 25
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
WP (C) No. 20/2022
Sadhia Choudhary
.....Applicant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through :- None
v/s
UT and Others
.....Respondent(s)
Through :- Mr. Raman Sharma, AAG with
Ms. Saliqa Sheikh, Advocate
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV KUMAR, JUDGE HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE MOKSHA KHAJURIA KAZMI, JUDGE
ORDER 19.09.2026
On the last two dates of hearing, there was no representation on
behalf of the petitioner. Today also, when the case was taken up nobody turned
up to appear for the petitioner. It seems that the petitioner is no more interested to pursue this petition.
This petition is, accordingly, dismissed for non-prosecution.
(Moksha Khajuria Kazmi) (Sanjeev Kumar) Judge Judge
JAMMU 19.09.2026
Manik
Sadhia Choudhary
UT and Others
Sanjeev Kumar
Moksha Khajuria Kazmi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
