Single judge order dismissing a writ petition (WP (C) No. 1984/2022) of Rattan Sharma as non-prosecution due to the petitioner's absence and lack of interest in pursuing the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Sr. No. 59
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
WP (C) No. 1984/2022
Rattan Sharma
.....Applicant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through :- None
v/s
UT of J&K and Others
.....Respondent(s)
Through :- Ms. Chetna Manhas, Assisting counsel to Ms. Monika Kohli, Sr. AAG
CORAM: HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE MOKSHA KHAJURIA KAZMI, JUDGE
ORDER 09.09.2026
For the last four dates of hearing, there was no representation on
behalf of the petitioner. Today also, when the case was taken up, nobody turned
up to appear for the petitioner. It seems that the petitioner is no more interested to pursue this petition.
This petition is, accordingly, dismissed for non-prosecution.
(Moksha Khajuria Kazmi) Judge
JAMMU 09.09.2026 Manik
Rattan Sharma
UT of J&K
Moksha Khajuria Kazmi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
