The petition to which the petitioner made no representation was dismissed for non-prosecution, and any interim directions were vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Serial No. 52 Regular List
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR
WP(C) No. 1869/2021
Taxi Operators and Owners …Petitioner(s)/Appellant(s). Cooperative Union Ltd Through: None
Vs.
UT of Ladakh and Ors.
...Respondent(s).
Through: Mr. T.M.Shamsi, DSGI
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNESH OSWAL, JUDGE
ORDER
09.09.2026
01. There has been no representation on behalf of the petitioner on the last date of hearing and same is the position today as well. It seems that petitioner is no more interested in pursuing the instant matter.
02. Dismissed for non-prosecution.
03. Interim direction, if any, shall stand vacated.
(RAJNESH OSWAL) JUDGE
SRINAGAR
09.09.2026
“Shamim Dar”
Taxi Operators and Owners
UT of Ladakh
Rajnesh Oswal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
