The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh dismissed a writ petition for non-prosecution, as the petitioner had lost interest in continuing the case.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
S. No.38 Regular list
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR
WP(C)/1641/2022 CM/4017/2022
BILAL AHMAD SHE
Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through: None.
Vs.
J AND K PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION AND ...Respondent(s) ORS
Through: Mr. Shah Amir, Advocate for R-1 & 2. Mr. G. N. Sofi, Advocate for R-3.
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MA CHOWDHARY, JUDGE ORDER 09.09.2026
There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. So was the case
on previous two dates as well, which suggests, that the petitioner has lost interest to prosecute this petition any further. The petition is thus, dismissed for non-prosecution along with connected application(s). Interim direction, if any, shall stand vacated.
(MA CHOWDHARY) JUDGE
SRINAGAR 09.09.2026
“Hilal”
BILAL AHMAD SHE
J AND K PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION
MA CHOWDHARY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
