The writ petition was dismissed for non-prosecution as no one appeared for the petitioners at the hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
S. No. 8 Regular List
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR
WP(C) No. 1418/2022
Siraj ud Din Hakim and Ors. …Petitioner(s)
Through: None
Vs.
UT of JK and Ors. ...Respondent(s)
Through: None
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL, JUDGE. ORDER
18.09.2026
01. On the last date of hearing i.e., 20th July, 2026 , the matter was adjourned on the request of learned counsel for the petitioners. Today, when the instant matter was taken up, no one has turned up to appear on behalf of the petitioners. It seems that petitioners are no more interested in pursuing the instant matter.
02. Dismissed for non-prosecution along with connected CM(s).
(WASIM SADIQ NARGAL) JUDGE
SRINAGAR:
18.09.2026
Siraj ud Din Hakim and Ors.
UT of JK and Ors.
Wasim Sadiq Nargal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
