Petitioner lost interest in prosecuting the writ petition. High Court dismissed the petition for non-prosecution and vacated interim direction if any.
Writ petition dismissed for non-prosecution; interim direction vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
72
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
WP(C) No. 1197/2022
Manish K Rai
…..Petitioner(s)/Applicant(s)
Through: None.
vs
Union of India & Ors.
.….Respondent(s)
Through: None.
CORAM: HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE MOKSHA KHAJURIA KAZMI, JUDGE
ORDER
15.09.2026
01. None for the petitioner. Same was the position on several dates of hearing. It appears that petitioner has lost interest in prosecuting the present petition. Hence, present petition is dismissed for non-prosecution along with connected application(s), if any.
02. Interim direction, if any, shall stand vacated.
(Moksha Khajuria Kazmi) Judge
Jammu
15.09.2026
A binash
Manish K Rai
Union of India
Moksha Khajuria Kazmi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
