Petition disposed. Respondents directed to consider petitioner's claim based on a coordinate bench judgment within eight weeks.
Direction to respondents to consider the claim of the petitioners in light of the cited judgment within eight weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Serial No. 11 Regular Cause list
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR
WP(C) 1128/2023
PIR GHULAM MOHI UD DIN SHAH AND …Appellant(s)/Petitioners(s) OTHERS
Through: Mr. L.A Latief, Advocate
Vs.
UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K AND OTHERS. (POWER DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT)
...Respondent(s)
Through: Mr. Shahbaz Sikander, AAG for R- 1 to 6 & 8 Mr. Mubashir Majid, Advocate for R-7
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SEKHRI, JUDGE.
ORDER
10.09.2026
(RAJESH SEKHRI) JUDGE
Srinagar: 10.09.2026 Adil Ismail
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Bashir Ahmad Bhat Vs. State & Ors.Referred¶1
Bashir Ahmad Bhat Vs. State & Ors.
Pir Ghulam Mohi Ud Din Shah
Union Territory of J and K
Power Development Department
Rajesh Sekhri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
