Petitioner requested to withdraw the writ petition. The High Court dismissed the petition, along with all pending applications, as withdrawn.
Petition and pending applications dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
91
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
Mohd. Latief Sofi.
202 …..Petitioner(s)/Applicant(s)
Through: Ms. Anandita Singh Thakur, Advocate.
vs
UT of J&K & Anr.
.….Respondent(s)
Through: None
CORAM: HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE MOKSHA KHAJURIA KAZMI, JUDGE
ORDER
08.09.2026
(Moksha Khajuria Kazmi) Judge
Jammu
A binash
08.09.2026
Mohd. Latief Sofi
UT of J&K
Moksha Khajuria Kazmi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
