High Court dismissed SWP for non-prosecution as no representation appeared on the part of the applicant on the date of hearing despite prior hearings without representation.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Sr. No. 30
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
SWP No. 2689/2010
Nitu Singh and another
.....Applicant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through :- None.
v/s
State and others
.....Respondent(s)
Through :- Mr. Anishwar Chatterjee Koul, GA
CORAM: HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE MOKSHA KHAJURIA KAZMI, JUDGE
ORDER 16.09.2026
There was no representation on behalf of the petitioners on 09.03.2026, 10.11.2025 and 06.12.2024. Today also, none appears on their behalf. It shows
that the petitioners are no longer interested in prosecuting the writ petition.
The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed for non prosecution.
(Moksha Khajuria Kazmi) Judge
JAMMU 16.09.2026 Raj Kumar
Raj Kumar 2026.09.17 09:39 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Nitu Singh
State
Moksha Khajuria Kazmi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
