Aijaz Ahmed v. State Th.Education Deptt.and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU SWP…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Sr. No. 42
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
SWP No. 2391/2017
Aijaz Ahmed …..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through: None
Vs
State of J&K and Ors. .…. Respondent(s)
Through: None
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL, JUDGE
ORDER
08.09.2026
1. The record reveals that there was no representation on behalf of the
is not interested in prosecuting the instant petition.
2. The instant petition is, accordingly, dismissed for non-prosecution.
3. Interim direction, if any, shall stand vacated.
(Wasim Sadiq Nargal)
Judge
Jammu
08.09.2026
Nikhil
Aijaz Ahmed
State of J&K
Wasim Sadiq Nargal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court