The High Court held that a service dispute amenable to the Central Administrative Tribunal is not maintainable in the Writ jurisdiction and transferred the petition to CAT Jammu.
Writ petition transferred to Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT), Jammu.Bench.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Sr. No. 44
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
SWP No. 2216/2018
Pranav Gandotra
.....Applicant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through :- None
v/s
State of J & K and another.
.....Respondent(s)
Through :- Mr. Dewakar Sharma, Dy. AG
CORAM: HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE MOKSHA KHAJURIA KAZMI, JUDGE
ORDER
15.09.2026
and the same is amenable to jurisdiction of Central Administrative Tribunal
(CAT), Jammu Bench.
Administrative Tribunal (CAT), Jammu.
(Moksha Khajuria Kazmi) Judge
JAMMU
15.09.2026
DIKSHA
Pranav Gandotra
State of J&K
MOKSHA KHAJURIA KAZMI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
