The High Court disposed of the SWP by directing respondents to consider the petitioner's claim in light of a specific Supreme Court judgment, with no objection from the State.
Direction to respondents to consider the claim of the petitioner in light of the aforementioned Supreme Court judgment.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Serial No. 14 Regular Cause list
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR
SWP 1612/2018
SHOWKAT HUSSAIN WANI
…Appellant(s)/Petitioners(s)
Through: Mr. N.A Malik, Advocate
Vs.
STATE OF J AND K AND ORS. (EDUCATION DEPARTMENT)
...Respondent(s)
Through: Mr. Bikramdeep Singh, Dy.AG vice Mr. T.A Lone, Dy.AG
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SEKHRI, JUDGE.
ORDER
09.09.2026
(RAJESH SEKHRI) JUDGE
Srinagar: 09.09.2026 Adil Ismail
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner's claim regarding pension/benefit should be considered in light of the Supreme Court judgment.
Whether the High Court can dispose of the petition by directing respondents to consider the claim.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Union Territory of Jammu and Kashmir & Ors. Vs. Saba WaniApplied¶1
2026 INSC 439 · Who else cites this
SHOWKAT HUSSAIN WANI
STATE OF J AND K
RAJESH SEKHRI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
