The special leave petition was dismissed as infructuous based on the recent Apex Court judgment in Saba Wani, citing the efflux of time. Interim directions were vacated.
Vacation of any interim direction and dismissal of the petition as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Sr. No. 46
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
SWP No. 1464/2014
Shazada Bano …..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through: None
Vs
State of J&K and others
.…. Respondent(s)
Through: Ms. Salika Sheikh, Advocate vice
Mr. Raman Sharma, AAG
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL, JUDGE
ORDER
03.09.2026
case titled “Union Territory of J&K and others Vs. Saba Wani” decided
on 30.04.2026, has been rendered infructuous.
(Wasim Sadiq Nargal) Judge
Jammu
03.09.2026
Rahul Sharma
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the current special leave petition has been rendered infructuous by the recent decision in Union Territory of J&K and others Vs. Saba Wani.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Union Territory of J&K and others Vs. Saba WaniRelied on¶17
Union Territory of J&K and others Vs. Saba Wani
Shazada Bano
State of J&K
Wasim Sadiq Nargal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
