Held against non-activist no advocate appeared for petitioner today court found proceed continuously adjourned request then petitioner not interested in further prosecution petition dismissed for want of prosecution.
petition dismissed for want of prosecution; interim direction vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Serial No.26 Regular Cause List
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR
SWP 1385/2013
SARFARAZ ABDULLAH AWAN
…PETITIONER(S)
Through: None.
V/s.
DIRECTOR GENERAL, CRPF, NEW DELHI
...RESPONDENT(S)
Through: Mr. T. M. Shamsi, DSGI with Mr. Faizan Ahmad Ganai, CGC.
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SEKHRI, JUDGE.
ORDER
03.09.2026
(RAJESH SEKHRI)
JUDGE
SRINAGAR:
03.09.2026
“Hamid”
Abdul Hamid Bhat I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
SARFARAZ ABDULLAH AWAN
DIRECTOR GENERAL, CRPF
RAJESH SEKHRI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
