Faiz Ahmad Dar v. Hassan Dar and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner failed to appear for two consecutive hearings. Court dismissed the petition in default for non-prosecution and vacated interim direction.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Serial No.13 Regular Cause List
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR
RSA 7/2022 CM(3640/2022)
FAIZ AHMAD DAR
…Appellant(s)\Petitioner(s)
Through: - None. V/s
HASSAN DAR AND ORS.
… Respondent(s)
Through: - None
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR JUSTICE SANJAY PARIHAR, JUDGE
(ORDER) 01.09.2026
behalf of the petitioner. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in
prosecuting the matter.
(SANJAY PARIHAR)
JUDGE
SRINAGAR 01.09.2026 Shaista-PS
FAIZ AHMAD DAR
HASSAN DAR
SANJAY PARIHAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court