A petition was dismissed as withdrawn with leave and liberty to approach appropriate remedy as prayed for. No substantive legal principles were discussed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
135 Supp
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR
CM(6059/2026) IN RP 46/2026]
ABDUL HAMID DAR AND OTHERS ….. Petitioner(s)
Through: Mr. Waqar ul Haq, Adv.
UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K (REVENUE) AND OTHERS
.. Respondent(s)
Through:
Coram:
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajnesh Oswal, Judge
ORDER
09.09.2026
(Rajnesh Oswal) Judge
SRINAGAR
09.09.2026
Aasif
Abdul Hamid Dar and Others
Union Territory of J and K (Revenue) and Others
Rajnesh Oswal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
