The High Court dismissed a review petition and connected contempt matter as infructuous after the Government confirmed implementation of the impugned judgment.
The review petition and connected contempt petition were dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Sr. No. 83
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
RP No. 07/2025 in
LPASW No. 174/2011
UT of J&K and Others
.....Applicant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through :- Mr. Meharbaan Singh, AAG
v/s
Daleep Kumar and Others
.....Respondent(s)
Through :- None
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV KUMAR, JUDGE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SHAHZAD AZEEM, JUDGE
ORDER 16.09.2026
Mr. Meharbaan Singh, learned AAG, while passing on a
Government order dated 03.02.2026 states that the judgment under review has been implemented and, therefore, this review petition has been rendered infructuous. His statement is taken on record. The copy of the Government Order dated 03.02.2026 is also taken on record.
Accordingly, the instant petition, along with CM No. 1365/2025, is
dismissed as having been rendered infructuous.
(Shahzad Azeem) (Sanjeev Kumar) Judge Judge
JAMMU 16.09.2026 Manik
Union Territory of J&K
Daleep Kumar
Sanjeev Kumar
Shahzad Azeem
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
