For want of prosecution, a review petition by Shankar Singh Rana under Article 226 of the Constitution was dismissed for his non-appearance despite three consecutive adjournments.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Sr. No. 9
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
RP No. 128/2022 In [SWP No. 1837/2002]
Shankar Singh Rana
.....Applicant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through :- None.
v/s
Union of India and others
.....Respondent(s)
Through :- Mr. Eishaan Dadhichi, CGSC vice Mr. Vishal Sharma, DSGI.
CORAM: HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE MOKSHA KHAJURIA KAZMI, JUDGE
ORDER 15.09.2026
For the last three consecutive dates of hearings, there is no representation
on behalf of the petitioner. Today also, no one appears on his behalf. It shows that petitioner is no more interested in prosecuting the review petition.
The petition, is accordingly, dismissed for want of prosecution, along with connected application, if any.
(Moksha Khajuria Kazmi) Judge JAMMU 15.09.2026 Raj Kumar
Raj Kumar 2026.09.15 16:18 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Shankar Singh Rana
Union of India
Moksha Khajuria Kazmi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
