Appellant withdrew appeal after entering compromise. Court dismissed appeal as withdrawn on 01.09.2026.
Withdrawal of appeal recorded; appeal dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Sr. No. 137
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
RFA No. 43/2025
Inderpal Singh
.....Applicant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through :- Mr. Vaibhav Sethi, Advocate
v/s
Damral Industries and Another
.....Respondent(s)
Through :- None
CORAM: HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE MOKSHA KHAJURIA KAZMI, JUDGE
ORDER 01.09.2026
Learned counsel for the appellant states that parties to the lis have entered into a compromise, as such, appellant seeks to withdraw the instant appeal. His statement is taken on record.
This appeal is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn. (Moksha Khajuria Kazmi) Judge
JAMMU 01.09.2026 Manik
Inderpal Singh
Damral Industries and Another
Moksha Khajuria Kazmi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
