The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh dismissed an appeal as abated after counsel for the appellant stated that the appellant had passed away during the pendency of the appeal.
Appeal dismissed as abated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Serial No. 23
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
RFA No. 36/2025 CM No. 4793/2025 Cav No. 1205/2025
Meenakshi Sharma
…..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through: Mr. Zulker Nain Sheikh, Advocate
vs
Shankar Dayal Khajuria
.…Respondent(s)
Through: Mr. Anil Khajuria, Advocate
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV KUMAR, JUDGE
ORDER
(18.09.2026)
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, states at Bar that the
appellant has passed away during the pendency of this petition and, therefore, this appeal has abated. His statement is taken on record.
In view of the above, this appeal is dismissed , as abated.
(SANJEEV KUMAR)
JUDGE
Jammu 18.09.2026 Sapna
Meenakshi Sharma
Shankar Dayal Khajuria
Sanjeev Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
