Petitioner did not appear at the last date of hearing or on the current date. Court held the petitioner is no longer interested. Petition dismissed for non-prosecution.
Petition dismissed for non-prosecution as petitioner failed to appear and pursue the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Sr. No. 59
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
OWP No. 859/2010
Safdar Khan
.....Applicant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through :- None
v/s
Jammu and Kashmir Spl. Tribunal and Others
.....Respondent(s)
Through :- Mr. Vivek Matoo, Advocate vice Mr. Vishal Bharti, Dy. AG
CORAM: HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE MOKSHA KHAJURIA KAZMI, JUDGE
ORDER 08.09.2026
On the last date of hearing, there was no representation on behalf of
the petitioner. Today also, when the case was taken up, nobody turned up to appear for the petitioner. It seems that the petitioner is no more interested to pursue this petition.
This petition is, accordingly, dismissed for non-prosecution.
(Moksha Khajuria Kazmi) Judge
JAMMU 08.09.2026 Manik
Safdar Khan
Jammu and Kashmir Spl. Tribunal
Moksha Khajuria Kazmi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
