Raj Rani v. State Th.Home Deptt.and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
This court dismissed the writ petition held to be rendered infructuous due to the petitioner's expired status and the efflux of time.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Sr. No. 71
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH
AT JAMMU
OWP No. 67/2006 IA No. 80/2006 c/w OWP No. 794/2006 IA No. 1050/2006
Raj Rani …. Petitioner/Appellant(s)
Through:Mr. Rahul Pant, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Anirudh Sharma, Advocate
V/s
State of J&K & Ors. …..Respondent(s) Through:None.
CORAM : HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE SINDHU SHARMA, JUDGE
ORDER 14.09.2026
1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been expired since long and with efflux of time the petition rendered infructuous.
2. In view of the aforesaid submissions, this petition is dismissed as
having been rendered infructuous.
(SINDHU SHARMA)
Judge
JAMMU
Meenakshi
14.09.2026
Meenakshi Devi 2026.09.16 11:03 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Raj Rani
State of J&K
Sindhu Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court