The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh disposed of the present petition as infructuous on the ground that the impugned detention order had outlived its life due to the efflux of time.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
S. No.85 Regular list
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR
HCP 294/2025
YOUNUS AHMAD MIR
Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through: Mr. Wajid Mohammad Haseeb, Advocate.
Vs.
UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K AND ORS.
...Respondent(s)
Through: Ms. Nadia Abdullah, Advocate vice Mr. Mohsin Qadri, Sr. AAG.
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MA CHOWDHARY, JUDGE ORDER
01.09.2026
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that with the efflux
of time, the present petition has been rendered infructuous as the impugned detention order has outlived its life. His statement is taken
on record.
Disposed of having been rendered infructuous.
(MA CHOWDHARY) JUDGE
SRINAGAR 01.09.2026
“Hilal”
YOUNUS AHMAD MIR
UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K AND ORS.
MA CHOWDHARY
JUDGE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
