The petition was dismissed for non-prosecution as the petitioner had lost interest in pursuing the matter across multiple dates of hearing; interim directions were vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
78
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
FAO(WC) 01/2024
Oriential Insurance Co Ltd.
…..Petitioner(s)/Applicant(s)
Through: Non
vs
Gudiya Devi. & Ors.
.….Respondent(s)
Through: None.
CORAM: HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE MOKSHA KHAJURIA KAZMI, JUDGE
ORDER
09.09.2026
01. None for the petitioner. Same was the position on last two dates of hearing. It appears that petitioner has lost interest in prosecuting the present petition. Hence, present petition is dismissed for non-prosecution along with connected application(s), if any.
02. Interim direction, if any, shall stand vacated
(Moksha Khajuria Kazmi) Judge
Jammu
09.09.2026 A binash
Oriential Insurance Co Ltd.
Gudiya Devi
Moksha Khajuria Kazmi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
