The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir dismissed the FAO for want of prosecution as the petitioner and his counsel failed to attend the hearing after the last date of representation.
The instant petition is dismissed for want of prosecution along with all connected CMs and interim direction is vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
S. No. 42 Regular
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR
FAO No. 12/2023 CM No. (3406/2023)
Hilal Ahmad Gilkar …Petitioner/Appellant(s)
Through: None
Vs.
Vijay Kumar Dhar And Anr.
...Respondent(s)
Through: Mr. Hakim Suhail Ishtiyaq, Advocate vice Mr. Sajad Ahmad Sofi, Advocate
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PARIHAR, JUDGE ORDER
07.09.2026
(SANJAY PARIHAR) JUDGE
SRINAGAR:
07.09.2026 Akhil Dev
Hilal Ahmad Gilkar
Vijay Kumar Dhar And Anr.
Sanjay Parihar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
