Heenu Choudhary and Others v. Rupali Choudhary
Case brief
What is this about?
The appellant sought withdrawal of the petition with liberty to file a fresh one with better particulars. The prayer was allowed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
S. No. 106 Suppl Cause List
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
(through virtual mode from Srinagar)
CRM(M) 983/2026 CrlM(1804/2026)
HEENU CHOUDHARY AND OTHERS …Appellant/Petitioner(s) (SENIOR CITIZEN)
Through: Mr. P.S. Pawar, Advocate
Vs.
RUPALI CHOUDHARY
...Respondent(s)
Through: None
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL, JUDGE
O R D E R 09.09.2026
1. Confronted with the situation on the question posed by the Court with regard to the maintainability of the instant petition, learned counsel, appearing for the petitioner seeks withdrawal of the instant petition with liberty to file a fresh one with better particulars.
2. Prayer is allowed.
3. Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.
(WASIM SADIQ NARGAL) JUDGE
SRINAGAR 09.09.2026 Shabroz
Heenu Choudhary and Others
Rupali Choudhary
Wasim Sadiq Nargal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court