Petitioner did not press the present writ petition at this stage due to pending investigation but reserved the right to challenge the charge sheet subsequently. The petition was dismissed as not pressed with liberty to re-file.
Discontinued with liberty to re-file.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
S. No. 10 Regular Cause List
IN THE HIGH COURT 0F JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR
CrlM(1684/2026) IN CRM(M) 746/2026 CrlM(1685/2026)
SAJAD AHMAD RAINA
…Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through: Mr. Sheikh Manzoor, Advocate.
Vs.
UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K (ANTICORRUPTION BUREAU) AND ANOTHER
...Respondent(s)
Through: None
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PARIHAR, JUDGE
ORDER
14.09.2026
1. After hearing counsel for the petitioner for some time, it is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that he would not press this petition at this stage because the investigation is yet to conclude rather would reserve his right to question the charge sheet as and when filed. His statement is taken on record.
2. Dismissed as not pressed with liberty to file fresh if need arises along with the connected CrlM(s).
(SANJAY PARIHAR)
JUDGE
Srinagar 14.09.2026 “Imtiyaz”
Imtiyaz Ul Gani I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
14.09.2026 15:44
Sajad Ahmad Raina
Union Territory of J and K (Anticorruption Bureau)
Sanjay Parihar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
