The petitioner failed to appear for the second consecutive hearing, leading the court to dismiss the petition for non-prosecution along with any connected applications and vacate interim directions.
None; petition dismissed for non-prosecution
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Sr. No. 194
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
CRM(M) No. 715/2025
Sanjit Singh ….. Petitioner(s)
Through: None
vs
Riaz Ahmed
.…. Respondent(s)
Through: None
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAHUL BHARTI, JUDGE
ORDER
15.09.2026
01. None for the petitioner. Same was the position on the last date of hearing. It appears that petitioner has lost interest in further prosecution of the matter.
02. In view of the above, present petition is dismissed for
03. Interim direction, if any, shall stand vacated.
(Rahul Bharti)
Judge
Jammu
15.09.2026 Riya
Sanjit Singh
Riaz Ahmed
Rahul Bharti
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
