Petition sought disposal with liberty to project contentions regarding the executing court's lack of power. The petition was disposed of on the same day without recorded reasoning. No substantive legal proposition is established as this order reserves the petitioner's rights to approach the executing court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
S. No. 195 Suppl. List
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR
CRM(M) No. 704/2026
Mohd Iqbal Bhat …Petitioner(s)
Through: Mr. Tariq M. Shah, Adv.
Vs.
Mohd Farooq Deva
...Respondent(s)
Through:
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNESH OSWAL, JUDGE. ORDER
02.09.2026
01. Learned counsel or the petitioner seeks disposal of the present petition with liberty to approach the learned executing court and to project the contention raised in the present petition with regard to the lack of power with the executing court to proceed ahead with the proceedings.
02. Disposed of as above.
(RAJNESH OSWAL) JUDGE
SRINAGAR:
02.09.2026
“ Shamim Dar ”
Mohd Iqbal Bhat
Mohd Farooq Deva
RAJNESH OSWAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
