The petitioners failed to appear for the hearing of this petition. The court inferred lack of interest and dismissed the petition for non-prosecution, vacating any interim directions.
Petition dismissed for non-prosecution; interim directions vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Sr. No. 15
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
CRM(M) No. 64/2025
Abdul Jaleel Kasana and others
…..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through: None
Vs
UT of J&K and others .…. Respondent(s)
Through: Ms. Sagira Jaffar, Advocate vice
Mr. Adarsh Bhagat, GA for R-1 & 2.
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL, JUDGE
ORDER 08.09.2026
1. The record reveals that there was no representation on behalf of the
petitioners on the last date of hearing and same is the position today as
well. Thus, an inference can be drawn that the petitioners is not interested
in prosecuting the instant petition.
2. The instant petition is, accordingly, dismissed for non-prosecution.
3. Interim direction, if any, shall stand vacated.
(Wasim Sadiq Nargal) Judge
Jammu
08.09.2026 Rahul Sharma
Abdul Jaleel Kasana and others
UT of J&K and others
WASIM SADIQ NARGAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
