The petition was dismissed for non-prosecution after the petitioners failed to appear on two consecutive hearing dates and did not respond to the court's direction to explain why they re-agitated a previously rejected cause of action. Interim directions were vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
S. No 19
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
CRM(M) No. 55/2026 CrlM No. 96/2026
Rakesh Kumar & Ors.
…..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through: None.
V/s
U.T of J&K & Ors. .…. Respondent(s) Through: Mr. Shubam Singh, Advocate vice Ms. Meenakshi Slathia, GA. Mr. R.D.S. Bandral, Advocate.
CORAM: HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE MOKSHA KHAJURIA KAZMI, JUDGE
ORDER (18.09.2026)
(MOKSHA KHAJURIA KAZMI) JUDGE
Jammu 18.09.2026 Renu
Rakesh Kumar & Ors.
U.T of J&K & Ors.
Moksha Khajuria Kazmi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
