The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh dismissed a petition under CRM(M) No. 472/2022 for want of prosecution as the petitioner remained absent from consecutive hearings without representation.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
S. No. 30 Regular Cause List
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR
CRM(M) No. 472/2022
Kadfeen Choudhary
…Appellant/Petitioner(s)
Through: None
Vs.
Sheikh Mohammad Tahir
...Respondent(s)
Through: None
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR JUSTICE SANJAY PARIHAR, JUDGE
O R D E R 15.09.2026
1. Petitioner has remained absent for the last three consecutive hearings
no representation on his behalf. It appears that the petitioner has lost interest in pursuing the matter and has abandoned the same after obtaining interim directions from this Court vide order dated 09th November 2022.
2. In the above background, this petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
3. Interim direction(s), if any, subsisting as on date, shall stand vacated.
4. Copy of this order shall be conveyed to the Trial Court, which shall proceed in accordance with law.
(SANJAY PARIHAR) JUDGE
SRINAGAR 15.09.2026 Shabroz
Kadfeen Choudhary
Sheikh Mohammad Tahir
Sanjay Parihar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
