The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir dismissed the writ petition and connected applications as the petitioners failed to appear on recent dates and were deemed disinterested in prosecuting the matter.
Writ petition and connected applications dismissed for non-prosecution; interim direction vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Serial No. 75
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
CRM(M) No. 457/2022 CrlM No. 939/2022
Shakeel Ahmed & Ors.
…..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through: None.
Vs
U.T of J&K & Ors.
.…. Respondent(s)
Through: Mr. Sumeet Bhatia, GA .
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL, JUDGE ORDER (03.09.2026)
last two consecutive dates of hearing. Today also, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioners. It appears that the petitioners
are no longer interested in prosecuting the present petition.
with connected application(s).
(WASIM SADIQ NARGAL)
JUDGE
Jammu
03.09.2026
Renu
Shakeel Ahmed & Ors.
U.T of J&K & Ors.
WASIM SADIQ NARGAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
