This is a one-line order dismissing an appeal/petition for want of prosecution because the appellant failed to file an affidavit and was absent from the subsequent proceedings.
Case dismissed for want of prosecution along with connected proceeding; interim directions vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
S. No. 04 Mediation Cause List
IN THE HIGH COURT 0F JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR
CRM(M) 177/2025 CrlM(389/2025)
KADFEEN CHOWDHARY
…Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through: None
Vs.
JAMMU AND KASHMIR BANK LIMITED
...Respondent(s)
Through: Mr. N. A. Dendru, Advocate
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PARIHAR, JUDGE
ORDER 10.09.2026
1. In terms of order dated 15.04.2024, the petitioner was required to file an affidavit, however, the same has not been filed. Thereafter the petitioner has absented from the proceedings which ex facie speaks that he is least interested to continue with the present proceedings.
2. Dismissed for want of prosecution along with connected CrlM.
3. Interim direction, if any, shall stand vacated.
(SANJAY PARIHAR)
JUDGE
Srinagar
10.09.2026
“Imtiyaz”
Imtiyaz Ul Gani I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
10.09.2026 15:19
KADFEEN CHOWDHARY
JAMMU AND KASHMIR BANK LIMITED
SANJAY PARIHAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
