This order dismisses a case for non-prosecution due to repeated non-appearances by the petitioner and vacates any interim direction.
Case dismissed for non-prosecution; interim direction vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Sr. No. 91
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
Case:CRM(M) No. 1036/2022
Kanak Pawar
…..Petitioner(s)/Appellant(s)
Through:
Vs
Ramesh Chander
Through:
.….Respondent(s)
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAHUL BHARTI, JUDGE
ORDER 07.09.2026
through mediation.
of the petitioner this case is dismissed for non-prosecution.
City Judge/JMIC, Jammu for record and reference.
(RAHUL BHARTI) JUDGE
JAMMU
07.09.2026 Muneesh
Muneesh Sharma 2026.09.14 10:53 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Kanak Pawar
Ramesh Chander
Rahul Bharti
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
