The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh dismissed Criminal Appeal No. 19/2023 for want of prosecution due to lack of appearances, absence of instructions, and no request for amendment of the memo of appeal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
S. No. 06 Regular Cause List
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR
CrlA(AS)/19/2023
GHULAM AHMAD PARRAY
…Appellant/Petitioner(s)
Through: None
Vs.
FURQAN AHMAD RATHER
...Respondent(s)
Through: None
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR JUSTICE SANJAY PARIHAR, JUDGE
O R D E R 16.09.2026
1. Neither the petitioner has laid any application seeking amendment of
2. Even today, when the matter was taken up, there is no appearance on behalf of the petitioner, suggesting lack of interest to prosecute this appeal.
3. Dismissed for want of prosecution.
4. Interim direction(s), if any, subsisting as on date, shall stand vacated.
(SANJAY PARIHAR) JUDGE
SRINAGAR 16.09.2026 Shabroz
GHULAM AHMAD PARRAY
FURQAN AHMAD RATHER
SANJAY PARIHAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
