The High Court dismissed a contempt petition for non-prosecution after the petitioners failed to appear on multiple hearing dates, including the final date, indicating they no longer pursued the alleged non-compliance.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Sr. No. 11
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
CPSW No. 152/2017 in SWP No. 542/2008
Khurshid Ahmed and Others
.....Applicant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through :- None
v/s
Shaleen Kabra Secy. Edu. Deptt. and Others
.....Respondent(s)
Through :- Mr. Raman Sharma, AAG with Ms. Jagmeet Kour, Advocate
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV KUMAR, JUDGE
ORDER 18.09.2026
On the last two dates of hearing there was no representation on behalf of the petitioners. Today also, when the case was taken up, nobody turned up to appear for the petitioners. It seems that the petitioners are left with no more grievance against the non-compliance of the order alleged in this contempt petition.
This petition is, accordingly, dismissed for non-prosecution.
(Sanjeev Kumar)
Judge
JAMMU 18.09.2026 Manik
Khurshid Ahmed and Others
Shaleen Kabra Secy. Edu. Deptt. and Others
Sanjeev Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
