This contempt petition was disposed of when the petitioner's counsel submitted that the impugned order had been complied with and no further pursuit was desired, leading the court to close the proceedings.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Serial No.23 Regular Cause List
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR
CCP(S) 442/2025 In WP(C) 2384/2023 CM(3822/2026) CM(5674/2026)
FAROOQ AHMAD AND ORS
…PETITIONER(S)
Through: Mr. B. A. Zargar, Advocate.
V/s.
OWAIS AHMAD AND ANR ...RESPONDENT(S)
Through: Mr. Mohsin S. Qadri, Sr. AAG with Mr. Muneeb Yousuf Wani, Advocate Mr. T. A. Lone, Dy. AG.
CORAM:
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Wasim Sadiq Nargal, Judge.
ORDER
14.09.2026
(WASIM SADIQ NARGAL) JUDGE
SRINAGAR:
14.09.2026
“Hamid”
Abdul Hamid Bhat I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document
FAROOQ AHMAD AND ORS
OWAIS AHMAD AND ANR
Wasim Sadiq Nargal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
