Skip to content

The research platform for Indian law — judgements, legislation and the citations between them. Free to search, with the original document behind every result.

A product of LawSathi.

Research

Search Legislation Research tools

Browse

Courts Case types Topics Most-cited judgements Sources

LawSathi

Practice platform Blog

© 2026 LawSathiTerms PrivacyResearch aid, not the official record.

Romal Singh Vs Ajeet Kumar Sahu Secy.P.H.E.Deptt.and Ors. — Contempt of Court | J&K HC (2026)

Home
J&K HC
2026
Romal Singh Vs Ajeet Kumar Sahu Secy.P.H.E.Deptt.andRomal Singh v. Ajeet Kumar Sahu Secy.P.H.E.Deptt.and Ors.

Dismissed

Romal Singh v. Ajeet Kumar Sahu Secy.P.H.E.Deptt.and Ors.

J&K HC7 Sept 2026CCP(S)/432/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Contempt petition disposed of as counsel submitted the underlying judgment of 03.11.2018 has been complied with in letter and spirit by the respondents.

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

Dismissed

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Contempt petition dismissed; the court accepted the submission that the earlier judgment directed to payment was complied with in letter and spirit, rendering the petition devoid of merit.

A compact analysis

This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.

A

97

HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU

CCP(S) No. 432/2019

Romal Singh

…..Petitioner(s)/Applicant(s)

Through: Ms. Arsha Sharma, Advocate.

vs

Ajeet Kumar & Ors.

.….Respondent(s)

Through: Ms. Chetna Manhas, Advocate vice Mrs. Monika Kohli, Sr. AAG.

CORAM: HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE MOKSHA KHAJURIA KAZMI, JUDGE

ORDER

07.09.2026

By way of the present contempt petition, the petitioner seeks initiation of contempt proceedings against the respondents for non-compliance of the judgment dated 03.11.2018, whereby the respondents were directed to pay to the petitioner such amount as was admittedly payable to him, preferably within a period of six weeks from the date a copy of the order was to be made available to them.

At this stage, learned counsel for the parties submit that the aforesaid judgment dated 03.11.2018 has been complied with by the respondents in its letter and spirit.

In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the parties, nothing further survives for consideration in the present contempt petition.

Accordingly, the contempt petition is disposed of. Notice, if any, stands discharged.

(Moksha Khajuria Kazmi)

Judge

Jammu

07.09.2026 A binash

Parties & counsel

AI extract

petitioner
Romal Singh
respondent
Ajeet Kumar & Ors.

Coram

AI extract

Moksha Khajuria Kazmi

Case details

As recorded by the court registry

Court: J&K HC
Decided on: 7 Sept 2026 · September
Registered: 19 Jul 2019
Case no.: CCP(S)/432/2019
CNR: JKHC020051502019
Topic: Contempt of Court
Disposal: Disposed Off

Similar cases

Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court

Finding judgements on the same questions…

Cite this judgement

Romal Singh v. Ajeet Kumar Sahu Secy.P.H.E.Deptt.and Ors., CCP(S)/432/2019 (J&K), decided on 7 September 2026.

The High Court of Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh publishes no neutral citation for this judgement — cite it by case number and date of decision.

Bench / Coram

Moksha Khajuria Kazmi

Parties & counsel